Critically Evaluate the Three Theories of Personality

Critic whollyy evaluate the leash theories of nature using faces from PE and Sport. The three theories of personality be mark Theory, fond education Theory and Interactionist Theory. All three espouse a crap a different perspective of how each individuals personality is formed. Trait possible action suggests that personality is made up of certain stable and enduring characteristics which arrest with a person from birth and do not change. They argon inherited and passed slew d peerless genes from the individuals parents.Therefore the equation for this possibleness is, behaviour = function of Personality or B = F (P). One strength of feature scheme is that it piece of tail be advantageously measured through questionnaires, quizzes, interviews etc. The nigh well known questionnaire for trait hypothesis is unmatchable designed by Eysenk. The questionnaire eachowed Eysenk to conduct a number for the individual which he would consequently plot onto a graph and be a ble to label them into twain dimensions extrovert/introvert and neurotic/stable. However, this theory does not prosecute into account the limit of the environment on personality.This theory potty be put into context when flavor at extroverts and introverts in sports. Extroverts tend to merriment in team sports, where they can be sociable, lively and are able to hire some leadership. However, introverts generally prefer to take part in individual sports as they are more unsociable, shy and nervous. Social nurture Theory implies that personality is manifestly formed through life experiences and environmental influences. Therefore the equation for this is Behaviour = head for the hills of personality (environment) or B=F(E).The concomitant that this theory, un interchangeable Trait theory, takes into consideration the achievement of the environment gives it an entirely different perspective. condescension this, the theory doesnt give all thought to inherent traits and the refore is relatively simplistic as personality seems to all be down to the environment and a persons experiences. To put this theory into context, an example may be that a person who surfs might surf rigorously because they grew up by the coast. This shows the environment has had an frame on their choice of sport to take part in. The Interactionist Theory is the final theory of the three.It suggests that personality is formed through a combination of traits from birth e. g. funny and then these traits are developed and enhanced through life experiences. The equation therefore macrocosm B = F (PE). This theory is sensibly just a mix of some(prenominal) Trait theory and Social Learning theory to produce a newly theory which contains aspects of both of these. It is this that makes it the most wide accepted theory used to rationalise behaviour in sport. Interactionist theory can be seen in sport when someone acts bulge of character to what they usually would.For example David B eckham, who is known for his gentle and shy nature, lashed out in a game against genus Argentina and received a red bug for his actions. David Beckham does not typically react like this, and so we can see that his traits were hard influenced upon by the environment which in this cheek was an opposing player. To conclude, all three theories are based on different perceptions and all come with their own strengths and weaknesses. The fact that they are theories reminds us that there isnt one that is deemed to be correct, and that it is down to opinion to which one you choose to believe.